Monday, January 25, 2010

Read Window (1954)

Reviewed 07.08.2007

Wheel-chair bound photographer L.B. Jefferies (James Stewart) is recovering from a nasty broken leg at home. Not content to be visited by his beautiful girlfriend, Lisa (Grace Kelly) and lovely nurse Stella (Thelma Ritter), Jeff occupies himself through a series of constantly changing vignettes courtesy of his courtyard. He's a peeper!! Watching through the windows and his camera lens, he plays along in the lives of the courtyard inhabitants. There is the dancer, 'Miss Torso' who dances all day and dates multi-men, 'Miss Lonelyhearts' who practices dates on her own, newly-weds, a frustrated bachelor composer, newlyweds and lovers, a nearly deaf sculptor, and bedridden Mrs. Thorwald and her husband Mr. Thorwald (Raymond Burr).

Jeff's voyeurism garners the scorn of his lady friends, but when he witnesses an argument between the Thorwalds and the missus disappears, Jeff becomes convinced that Mr. Thorwald has murdered his wife. When presented with the 'facts' of the case, the three are determined to get to truth.

Some 50+ years later, Rear Window remains an effective thriller. Director Alfred Hitchcock is a master of suspense, as he allows the emotion to build until the viewer is practically at wit's end before effectively delivering a climax that leaves the heart pounding. Slowly, the viewer, alongside Jeff gets to know the comings and goings of the neighborhood. The viewer is just as suspicious when the flowers beds suddenly seem taller, the dogs disappears and suddenly Mrs. Thorwald is missing. Hitchcock gets us all to forget that we're all engaging in licentious behavior, or rather, murder is worse than what we're doing.

As with the films of this period, everything is quite dapper. Jimmy Stewart and Grace Kelly are beautiful on-screen. Their relationship alone, she's a high society girl; he's a nitty-gritty photographer adds another layer of interest. Hitchcock's ingenuity keeps viewer curiosity alive. Imagine the limitations of filming a courtyard and yet, he creates a vibrant little place that we actually want to watch. Just like Jefferies, we are immobilized and anxious when we feel the look of Mr. Thorwald's eyes upon us.

Rear Window is a taunt piece and fine example of classic film making. Simple in nature, but technically brilliant. Hitchcock was a master manipulator of emotions and certainly out nerves. Well worth a viewing!

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Citizen Kane (1941)

Reviewed: 07.23.2007
Following the death of newspaper tycoon and philanthropist Charles Foster Kane, news reporters set out to discover the meaning behind his last word... "Rosebud". Kane's life is re-examined through a series of newsreel footage in an attempt to discover the man behind the persona.

Citizen Kane is considered one of Hollywood's classics. Judging this film by today's standards, doesn't do either party justice. To think generations are missing out because of it's age or that it's B&W is sad. Citizen Kane is on top of those lists for a reason. After viewing, you'll see why.

Grandiose and bombastic, Orson Wells embodies Kane from the ambitious 20-something to the disillusioned 60 year old, Wells makes Kane overwhelmingly real. It's a masterful performance. The supporting cast of characters all seem to be operating on another plane, symbolizing periods of time in this man's life.

The visual styling of Citizen Kane is unconventional and stunning. Creating themes through the symbolism, special effects, scoring and detailed cinematography, the film assaults the senses. Combined, the viewer is easily engrossed in the story of a vulnerable man and his Rosebud.

Citizen Kane, again, is essential viewing for film fans. However, the dependence of symbolism may very well impede the best of intentions.

01.24.2010 ~ Although the secret is out, I love this one.  The symbolism is key.  'Grandiose and bombastic' still stand.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

I, Robot (2004)

Reviewed 01.10.2005

Whether it's aliens or robots, Will Smith can save the world all the while cracking jokes. I, Robot could be I, Amcreepedout for those of you having read Issac Asimov's book. Other than that, this movie is based VERY loosely on his work. Without giving away, what is sometimes an obvious plot...
  • Sonny, the main robot, creeps me out and yet, I find myself rooting for him (not for long).
  • Detective Spooner, we discover things are not what they seem.
  • Susan Calvin needs a life.
  • V.I.K.I is whack.
The film is choppy at best, but not bad for 115 minutes. (Remember, Will Smith movie?!) Before you think I didn't like it, I did. In a 'Will Smith can't play a role without randomly smarta$$ing his way through' kind way. That's what I liked. The rather aimless character development and plot was fine by me. My only disappointment, Smith didn't kick enough robot alloy, including Sonny's.